Jesus Christ is made up story by Roman Catholic Church for social political control. Yelling doesn't make your point any more accurate. You had an entire crew of holy zealots who broke from Jerusalem and moved Qumran/Kumran and Massada because they felt the rest of their countrymen were not zealous enough in their devotion to the word of god. Here's a quick and by no means exhaustive list of a few of the problems you can find between the stories in the NT, that are mutually exclusive. This book is must read!!! Speaking of biblical books not claiming to be firsthand accounts, do you recall the beginning of Luke? Paul Robeson and Rex Ingraham were just as good. There are several ways to be notified about new content on TDF. as always. Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2018. Have you ever seen the televised debate between Richard Nixon and John F. Kennedy? Where does Paul mention this and so what if he does? They do tell us that the war that started in the year 66 was a reaction to the death of James the Just. At the end of the day is the people in control getting what they want? Religion, used to instill hope in desperate times. I'm interested in the human story of how this particular myth began and evolved. At first I read this with little comprehension. well,you are some sort of 'creationist' as you create an atmosphere of The collection of books in question were composed or compiled in this mellieu and were most assuredly contentious and radical enough to place certain figures names into code for their own survival. You don't speak for anyone else, and certainly not me. I'm certain Napoleon existed and did all that he was credited with and have no doubts about Plato, Copernicus and Newton, yet I never had tea with any them. I would suggest that similarities with the Roman Sol Invictus cult and elements of Mithraism enabled the construction of an easy alloy religion that Constantine recognised he could easily control if he made it the official religion of the empire and then placed himself at the top - a bit like Henry 8th did later. Was Jesus a Palestinian Jew? And once again, this is a public forum and I will post whenever I want. Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video! If that type of extrapolation could happen now why could it not happen two thousand years ago? Almah, the Hebrew word for young woman was mistranslated into the Greek parthenos. Nothing. And just what does TF stand for? Please get back once you´ve read and analysed all the secular sources yourself. Your post reveals a serious lack of education on the subject and your distorted view of scholarship is reflected in your last paragraph demanding that the majority of biblical scholars agree with your choice of candidate for the title "historical Christ" or else. 3. Just ignore them, or pass them off with a fallacy and go back to your sandpit face-plant. The full agenda which we have shows that you don't know what you're talking about. Oh that they both are and let's add the late (thankfully) Jerry Falwell and Oral Roberts. : Summit University Press, 1987. Have you? Their stories may differ and emphasise the part that made an impression on them, BUT their stories will be consistent with each others, and NOT mutually exclusive. And though all my comments are sure to be buried and to no avail, I think it's worth mentioning that no amount of reason will get through. So why you bring this up is beyond me. The Hebrews copped their history from the Babylonians during their enforced sojourn after the sacking of Jerusalem in 587BC. I guess you speak three languages. As for owning your holiness - what holiness? Mr.Tallen, the Philokalia, My life In Christ by St.John Kronstadt, Unseen Warfare, the Ladder of Divine Ascent by St John Klimacos --there is much to read. God, in essence he is Good, he is perfect, he is our creator who gives us life and a free will to do as we please or to choose him. Josephus cannot be excluded because he adds to our knowledge who the historical Jesus really was. One last question, If you were God what would you do differently? And he does himself, and all serious, honest scholars, a terrible disservice by making unfounded, extremist, patently dogmatic claims about the historicity of Jesus. Just where do you get the idea that theological (biblical) historians are not relevant anymore--for whatever that means. Helen, most -- but not all -- so called "Americanisms" are original British English that have been preserved in the U.S. since colonial days. But anyway, lets go back to you. How would YOU know His image anyway? Any knowledge that I possess is available to anyone who cares to do the research. So I have to blindly accept what you cannot support. The early compilers of the biblical texts could have resolved this gap with a single line of text- but do not, and what did Jesus do during the 40 days after the resurrection where the bible text specifically tells its readers that these things are known but wont be shared? The funny thing about this Robert is that I suspect that we are more in alignment on this issue than in disagreement. Use some after you examine the problems properly yourself. isn't this exactly what humanity is? IF you're correct, then yours is the only God. Dr. Carrier and a great many others would disagree that there is any real evidence that Jesus existed. you want to know what he did from 12-30? Shame there were no recording devices or printing presses at the time. I offer nothing other than my skepticism and lack of first hand sources. Granted, most of us choose the latter, and blame him for our actions, or blame religion for our decisions. Quite laughable. Get honest with yourself for a change Alex. I don't play games. Your evidence is... a copy of a copy of a copy..., written by someone that wasn't there, and also supposedly wrote about his own death and funeral after he died. I have no idea what you're talking about. Begin your journey of spiritual awakening! "Well! And no, the names Mary and Joseph are not titles. Unlike Goldilocks, his life has a context that is well known and is established as fact. They couldn't have included a single paragraph about what Jesus did and why for the 40 days in the narrative he raised from the dead? excellent observation. They say, Jesus as written in the bible existed (you have to be specific cause lots of guys had that name, Yeshua), and I reject that claim. There are no such flags in his squib about "Jesus" which also mentions Pontius Pilate. This is just another one of your baseless claims for which your quote provides no support whatsoever. Your kind has proven time and time again you can NOT be trusted to stay ethical towards your fellow humans. The Buddha Religion - 112 min - ★ 7.94 This documentary for PBS by award-winning filmmaker David...; The Secret Family of Jesus Religion - 100 min - ★ 7.13 This is the narrative of the intrigue that Dan Brown failed...; The Story of Lord Buddha Religion - ★ 7.65 The Buddha, the founder of the great religious philosophy...; The Naked Truth Religion - ★ 7.75 Documentary … Daniel loves the maverick. How dare you hide your threats behind your God, you don't even have the bravery to own your own threats. (hint: the telephone). I was specifically referring to the personal charisma that leaders had to have prior to the 20th century, when one had to be in their presence to be swayed by their influence. Calling it all a bunch of lies is an indication of a bias that says you don't care to listen to reason or any type of logic. (my avatar) Throwing it in as you did in parenthesis is unnecessary and pretentious. (Are you even aware that Mathew, Mark, Luke and John were not authored by the Apostles?). That there is no substance in your behalf just arguments. Actually, that's DiMeglio. None of them ever relates to or confirms any relevant portion of the biblical mythology of the New Testament saga. No 'Her' image to copy. It is unlikely that Tacitus, one of the pre-eminent historians of his day, would have written about both "Jesus" and Pontius Pilate based solely on hearsay and the bible which wasn't even codified until a century after his death. The Samaritan prophet and James the Just are two of those historical characters who got merged into the pagan legend of Jesus Christ. -Who was already in the tomb? Hmmm. And again you're comparing people that did science/philosophy with a religious mythological figure. I think Jesus was a Palestinian Time Traveller Magician Jew, something about the narration makes this so boooooring. There are many variations on the term: Caucasian. I hope this is clear even to you. On the other hand, what have you produced? 2. Don't crucify me though. Even Angelic names refer to official positions within the temporal temple hierarchy. I read about this; however Dr. King, the document's curator, cautions against using this as proof positive that Jesus was married. A doc of perhaps more revealing nature is one titled "The Lost Gospels" where the years of Jesus' childhood and adolescence pop up. The DSS's clearly explain the codes. And it also doesn't surprise me that the name "Jesus" in whatever incarnation was fairly common during the period in question. Argument from generalized authority isn't going to scoot you around that to come to your conclusion. Chrestus actually had a totally different meaning than apologetics will have it. The whole documentary is about him yet they never use his birth name Joshua Benhur. The irony is that I haven't even made any contentious claims. This is why I take exception to Helmer2's opening, "All we actually can know about the historical Joshua/Jesus . It matters that Jesus existed because Christianity is CRAP and people blindly believe all the BS told about him. Or Jack...or Daniel? Did I just do your homework for you? Instead he got k-lined at a wedding and dissed his mum. And I'm encouraged to finally read The Outsider. There is no historicity in the three “events” you present. Why is it mentioned at all then? Which brings up yet another problem for your 'story', how could Aramaic speaking, most probably illiterate 'fisherman' compose 'books' written in the 'intellectual' language of the time? “This post and your last clearly demonstrate that you are not up to date on the subject in any way, shape or form and I resent the snow job as much as I resent your characterization of historical beliefs as theological ones (i.e., faith-based). How else do you think gods were created back then - and why do you think none are created NOW?? By the way, I resent riddles or being expected to read someone's mind. But there is NO evidence based reason to believe that is the case. i'm not qualified to hold a case against mainstream scholarship but john allegro,edmund wilson & geza vermes are!translating texts found in qumran,they were shelved as they wanted to publish material that did not confirm roman-catholic teachings (the dead sea scrolls deception by m.baigent-r.leigh) .look it up & decide if that is the correct procedure to treat historical material that posits new questions.thats why i question the consensus as it blocks newly found Actually it's a series of made-up stories by what became the Roman Catholic Church--but you're right about the social/political control. Real Sacrifice? In addition, secular support for "Jesus" existence and crucifiction is provided by Josephus, Suetonious, Pliny the Elder, Lucian and Tacitus, all pre-eminent historians writing somewhat after the subject period. Ahh, that's how you reconcile the contradictions, the same as others with 'faith'. Has a comfy feel. Ehrman also stresses the importance of using several different methods for verification, not just one. I think it would have been a better doc if they talked about that instead of the relationship with his mother etc. Brief content visible, double tap to read full content. As is one of the questions it brings up- why are there such huge gaps in the narrative? The Cato the Younger I know of was born ca 95 BC and died 46 BC, well before Tacitus was born. The facts are the facts, yes, but whether a bunch of credible people agree with them is neither here nor there. But no record of a man crucified for performing fantastic miracles and claiming to be the real king???) And they would be foolish to assume such a far-fetched thing. The "actual" life of Jesus nobody really knows, well except the people of his time, and the people that lived with him. It could just be any Chrestus at all. Okay, so you do understand that scribes existed back then correct? The Buddhist connection is the thesis of Ch. why do you even care what I, or anyone else here thinks? You're going to need a lot more than lack of firsthand sources to be able to justify your skepticism. self relief that bad things don't happen to good people for no reason. But I'm Czech, so what could I know about Americanisms anyway... You're right. Because you are insulting first with your preaching, so I'm replying in kind. They are all based on theological/scholarly faith principles, not historical principles. You said; I have to say I'm with robertallen on this one. 3. Before he knows it he's pushing 30, got no girlfriend and his rapscallion ways have him known all over Galilee. Learning cured him of that. I know they're not all what you think and claim, so don't talk to me about that here Alex. feel free to make your case but please read the comment policy and do not try to convert others. Once again, bald assertions are not scholarship. The problem is Xians swallow the Bible's malarchy and think they're right. An enjoyable overview of research supporting the possible journey of Jesus (Yeshua, Issa) to Tibet, Nepal, and India during what is referred to as "the lost years" or … Considering the summary proceeding of "Jesus'" crucifiction as described in the synoptic gospels (esimtated at about 12 hours from arrest to punishment) and considering what a negligible nit "Jesus" was in his own lifetime, I can believe that he, along with many others crucified like him, were not included in the Roman annals we have--and by the way, Jesus was not crucified for performing miracles. In short, you are completely unschooled in historical/biblical scholarship or for that matter any type of historical scholarship, considering your inability to understand the difference between historical claims and theological ones, and have no business making any claims period.
Are Doritos Tangy Cheese Halal,
Purple Dressing For Wounds,
Grilled Cheese Academy,
Sailor Ink Studio 173,
1010 Angel Number Meaning,
Dave Marciano Good Decisions,
How Do I Contact Abc News By Email,
Jeffrey Saad Restaurant,
Eaton Truetrac Problems,
Nutanix Cvm Commands,
Savage Dark Memes Imgur,
Bobcat Track Pattern,